During the time of Trump, some have wondered why the conservative white mostly-religious males who make up the Republican base seemed so angry and resentful so much of the time. Their party, after all, controlled the whole federal government -- shouldn't they have been happy at having so much power backing up their views? They often behaved as if they felt powerless and persecuted. Why?
I believe it's because their main grievances have always been cultural, not political. They don't like gay visibility and the growing respect for gay rights and gay marriage. They don't like women's independence and the acceptance of abortion. They don't like the self-assertiveness of black Americans and the growing presence of Hispanic culture and the Spanish language. They don't like visible sexuality, especially unconventional sexuality. They don't like secular culture and outright mockery of religion. They don't like the way the health-care crisis is fostering support for a major government role in protecting people (even as it dawns on them that the old system is intolerably cruel even to themselves). They particularly don't like it when they themselves, and their beliefs and prejudices, are the target of scorn. They feel that they should be the dominant group, or at least those who set the tone and character of society, and they resent being more and more a marginal fringe. American culture is inexorably evolving away from what they think it should be, and it alarms them.
The Republican party, and especially Trump, have played expertly on these feelings, but even with political power, there's little they can do about such trends. Politics, it is said, is "downstream" from culture -- culture eventually shapes politics, but there is very little politics can do to affect culture. Republicans can change laws to torment and hurt groups they don't like, but this doesn't make the cultural mainstream share their dislike of those groups -- if anything, it breeds sympathy for them, and ultimately a backlash.
Even with all federal power in the hands of a right-wing party led by a character as ruthless as Trump, cultural evolution is simply continuing, almost as if politics didn't exist. The growth of the non-religious percentage of the population continues. Mass culture -- movies, music, and so on -- still reflects the views and values of the educated, pluralistic, outward-looking coastal cities. Religion and traditional values are still widely treated as faintly ridiculous. Trump called neo-Nazis in Charlottesville "very fine people", but being identified among the marchers there still got people fired and ostracized, and being filmed venting a racist rant
has the same effect.
Hence the frustration of the knuckle-draggers -- politically they'd won everything, but in terms of the stuff that was really bothering them, it didn't seem to matter.
Expect even more anger and resentment after this week's election as the reality of it sinks in. Politics is still downstream from culture. Trump's 2016 win was a freak event -- trendlines are never perfectly smooth, and anomalies and setbacks do happen. But what happened on Tuesday was normality beginning to reassert itself. The country is still inexorably changing, still evolving away from the old pattern the Trumpanzees long to restore.
This manifested itself politically this week, not only in our victories, but even in many of the defeats. Republicans won a lot of stuff by narrow margins that they "should" have won overwhelmingly.
When a Democrat in Texas gets within three percentage points of beating an incumbent Republican Senator -- the country is changing.
When Republicans defeat a black woman for Governor of Georgia by only a tiny margin (so tiny, in fact, that
it's not yet certain that they defeated her at all), and manage to do it only by using the most flagrant, brazen vote-suppression schemes since the Jim Crow era -- the country is changing.
When states as red as Utah, Idaho, and Nebraska
pass ballot propositions to expand Medicaid, and Republicans who spent years trying to repeal the ACA have to flat-out lie and masquerade as the defenders of its provisions -- the country is changing.
When an out lesbian gets elected to Congress from
Kansas -- the country is changing.
At worst, a wingnutized Supreme Court might reverse
Obergefell, but that wouldn't affect the growing public acceptance of gay marriage, and most states other than the most benighted fundie hellholes would reinstate it on their own. Or the Court might reverse
Roe, but if substantial numbers of women who wanted abortions were actually blocked from having them, the backlash would sweep away the forced-birth fetishists in most state legislatures along with the laws they passed. Either ruling would, within a decade, be seen as another
Dred Scott -- a horribly embarrassing mistake in dire need of correction -- and deep down even the wingnuts know it. Indeed, I strongly suspect that John Roberts, conscious as he is of the Court's reputation, would not allow such errors.
And don't even get me started on what would happen if the Republicans managed to make Christianity the country's official religion. You just know that whatever concrete form this took would be as trite, cringe-worthy, and phony as any money-grubbing TV evangelist, and would immediately become the butt of joke after joke. Bill Maher and
Saturday Night Live would have a field day.
The wingnuts bark, but the caravan moves on.
o o o o o
See also observations on the election by other bloggers --
Tengrain,
Shaw Kenawe,
Hackwhackers,
PM Carpenter,
Libby Anne,
Professor Chaos,
Donna M,
John Pavlovitz,
David Futrelle,
Robert Vella,
El Jefe at Juanita Jean's (on Texas),
Simon Alkenmayer (for the discouraged),
Crazy Eddie (on Michigan referenda),
Booman (on the suburban realignment), and the inimitable
Shower Cap.
