12 February 2026

Some straight talk on who I am, and why I'm not a political blogger

First, some personal history.  Long-time readers already know some of this, newer ones probably not.

I don't know whether I've ever had what most people would consider a really normal life.  There were issues during childhood which, I came to realize much later, had a profoundly traumatic effect, and probably account for the great difficulty I've always had in forming normal social relationships.  I am not going to say any more about that here.  Over the last few years, I have had professional help in exploring and overcoming the damage it did, but I'm not ready to spread it any further.

I at least had very good health until the early-onset arthritis hit.  I still have no idea why it attacked me as early as it did -- some people are just unlucky.  I needed my first hip replacement at age forty-seven, and the other one eight years later.  Those operations preserved my ability to walk, but the arthritis damage has kept on progressing.  I've mentioned from time to time that my hands and feet are quite disfigured, enough that it sometimes unpleasantly startles people who suddenly notice.

My life really changed in September of 2010, when my mother had a devastating stroke.  She barely survived, but was no longer able to live independently.  For the next nine years, my life almost entirely revolved around taking care of her.  I visited her every day (except for a couple of short periods when medical issues prevented it), did all her shopping, drove her to appointments, festooned her apartment walls with signs reminding her of the essential things she could no longer remember on her own.  After about seven years her mind deteriorated to the point where it was no longer safe for her to live in an apartment, and I had to move her to an elder-care facility with security and routine supervision.  I still kept visiting her every day, having meetings with the management, keeping after them when I felt her care was not up to necessary standards.  This sometimes involved substantial conflict.

She finally died in December of 2019, having lost the ability to speak and most of her memory some time earlier.  But she always recognized me.

During most of that nine-year period, I was still doing full-time office work.  Between that and taking care of her, I had almost no time or energy for anything else.  What interpersonal connections I had, decayed and disappeared as I kept focused on my mother's needs while also struggling with the typical demands and idiocies of "normal" jobs.  More than once, the stress involved brought me to the brink of suicide.  Had it not been for my counselor, I'm sure I would actually have done it.  I've suffered a chronic obsession with suicide ever since, to varying degrees.

My mother's death was devastating.  We had always been very close, like best friends.  Very soon after she died, the covid pandemic hit, driving me into another form of isolation for a further period of time.  By the time conditions had returned to normal, I had gone for so long with almost no social interaction with people beyond the most trivial, that my ability to handle such interaction at all had seriously atrophied.

My reason for recounting all this is not to ask for sympathy (certainly there are people who have had worse), but to make it clear what kind of circumstances have dominated my life and consciousness and continue to do so.  As long-term readers know, I have a wide range of interests in science, history, and other areas, and it's to those that my mind turns when it can spare the energy.  All the stuff about Trump and elections and politics generally, which seems to totally dominate the minds of many bloggers, has never been anything more to me than distant background noise.  I spent nine years watching the only person I've ever actually loved rot away mentally and die.  Nothing else will ever hurt like that.

It's now more than six years since she died, and while the pain will never really fade, I have adapted to it to an extent.  Social Security, Medicare, and a somewhat improved financial situation have finally allowed me to retire from work with a reasonable degree of security, if I'm careful.  I'm not sure how long I'll live now -- sixty-five isn't really old by today's standards, but I'm starting to feel old.  I certainly don't take a long remaining life for granted.

My point is, I've earned a few years of peace and quiet, however long I have left.  For those who obsess about politics to the point that four out of five blog posts you write deals with it, who chew over every latest outrage Trump comes up with, who are always there for every march and rally, who treat every election as a hair-on-fire five-alarm emergency -- that's all fine, you do what you feel you must, but I cannot join you, and will not attempt to.  Even if I had the energy for it, I am not going to spend the time I have left on that kind of wearisome drudgery and stress.  I finally have the opportunity for some of that peace and quiet, and I'm going to take it.

I don't understand the mentality that always has US domestic politics at the back of its mind and treats everything else as some kind of indirect reference to politics or an excuse to bring it up, as if no other subject were worth talking about in its own right.  I do not always have politics at the back of my mind.  When I write about something else, I really am writing about that something else.  It's not some kind of indirect reference to Trump.

My only reason for continuing this blog is to foster interactions with people who have the same kinds of interests and views as I do.  I have zero interest in arguing with people about things and I've made that explicit.

I read about politics to the extent necessary to avoid becoming uninformed, but increasingly find myself avoiding many aspects of it.  There are blogs, and other sites focused on art or other areas of aesthetics, where politics never comes up, or is even explicitly banned as a topic.  Such parts of the net are an oasis to me, a refuge.

The political blogosphere includes some pretty nasty, intolerant characters, anyway.  This is rather frequently forced on my attention.  Their default response to any dissent from whatever rigid political orthodoxy they subscribe to is a barrage of insults and disdain.  They don't want thought, they want one more interchangeable person marching in lockstep and chanting the same old slogans in unison.  They are, in a certain sense, not conscious.

Recently I read a short poem by another blogger, evoking a harsh struggle with "awe and rage", with "pain and anguish".  I left a comment along the lines of:  "I don't know what specifically inspired this, but I understand the feeling".  Another commenter, in an insulting tone, responded that of course you know what inspired it.  I realized that he's one of those people for whom politics is a constant mental presence, for whom it's automatically obvious that any such negative emotions as the poem referenced must be something to do with Trump, politics, the same-old same-old, even though it didn't mention any of that.  I don't understand that mentality.  I never will.

I have made some contribution to the political struggle, by writing several posts pointing out the obvious errors of the left which make them vulnerable to losing what should be easily winnable elections -- the all-important elections which determine whether or not the left will get into power at all and be able to enact whatever agenda it has -- and suggesting how such errors can be corrected.  I don't expect the hard-core ideological types to gain anything from reading such posts.  Their thinking is too rigid to assimilate and consider any idea outside the orthodoxy they're committed to, and they can't seem to react in any way other than robotically re-asserting that orthodoxy.  But I hope some people who are less ideological and less committed, but who still take an interest in politics, will find something worth thinking about there.

But that's the only kind of contribution I'm prepared to make.  After all this time, I finally have a chance for a fairly stress-free life for a few years, and I'm going to take it.  It's what my mother would have wanted, and it's what I've earned.

10 February 2026

Image round-up for 10 February 2026

More pictures from my collection -- click any image for full size.

[For the link round-up, click here.  For the food video post, click here.]























Azurite  (from Russia)




Prague


















08 February 2026

Videos of the day -- eat right

There are two widely-promoted systems for healthy eating.  One is actually healthy, the other is a scam.



The last part of this is rather telling.  And yes, people who make money by encouraging people to eat things that will end up killing them are fair game.

07 February 2026

Link round-up for 7 February 2026

Various interesting stuff I ran across on the net over the last week.

o o o o o

Wow!  It's a real self-driving car!

You will regret bothering the hippopotamus.

Don't try to play basketball while flying.

The German writing at the beginning says "this is why women live longer than men".

Just drive the truck up the ramp.

The bubble is impressive in size.

An angry man is a careless man.

The cats are on the move.

Do not offend the horse.

She chooses the right tools to get the job done (slightly NSFW).

Raise the periscope to check things out before surfacing.

It's twins!

I don't think this baseball pitcher is enjoying the game very much.

Find out what kind of car this is and don't buy one.

Do not hire this construction crew.

You can knot afford to miss out on these practical skills.

Evolutionary theory suggests that stupid behavior should reduce an organism's chances of reproducing.  Here is an example.

In Norway, clearing snow can be a big job.

China accounts for almost two-thirds of global growth in solar and wind power -- which is important since China is the world's biggest greenhouse-gas producer.

There's a problem with Cybertruck door latches, apparently.  With all of the known problems, no wonder the damn thing is a bigger flop than the Edsel.

An "AI" tourism site encouraged visitors to go to hot springs that don't exist.  Don't use things like this.

Do we need to re-think psychology?  Your comments are invited.

Firefox's long-promised switch to get rid of all its "AI" "features" is scheduled to be available on February 24More here including a short video with more detail.

If you use Gmail, you cannot permanently stop it from buggering up your e-mails.  Just switch to Proton -- which, aside from being secure and mostly bullshit-free, raises and donates millions to support free expression and internet privacy.

Microsoft is trying to give the impression that it's going to trim back the "AI" infestation in Windows 11.  It isn't.

A wax figure of Idris Elba was able to unlock his phone using facial recognition.  Anyone with a reasonably good photo of you and picture-editing software to make it look three-dimensional could probably do the same.

"Underconsumption-core" is a movement pushing back against the ad- and influencer-driven fake culture of endlessly buying more and more junk (link from Rade).

Billions of dollars are being invested in "AI" companies which can't even describe a proposed product, much less actually make anything.

Here are some businesses to avoid shopping at (note:  this blogger does not want political comments on her posts).

"AI" psychosis is disturbingly common, with almost one in every thousand conversations producing "reality distortion" (and most chatbot users have many conversations, so the rate per person must be much higher).

The American Academy of Pediatrics is issuing its own vaccine guidance, since whatever RFK Jr's den of quacks emits is now worthless.

Mocking smug, pompous prigs is still recognized as free speech, apparently (the last part is blocked, but you'll get the gist of it).

Did Trump audibly 💩 himself on live TV?

A professor used "AI" to "write" a "textbook".  Here's what the result looks like.

In 2022 two teenagers developed a program that de-shittyized Instagram.  Within days, Meta forced it to be taken down.

Two words: "Elon Musk".

Boycott?  What boycott?

I'm glad the Satanists won based on equal rights, but this whole thing is ridiculous.  They should just take down the extra flagpole and stop tying themselves in knots over who can use it and who can't.

Unions from across the US are challenging Gavin Newsom on his pro-"AI", pro-billionaire-tech-bro stance.

What does JK Rowling actually do, aside from writing?

Don't confuse ICE agents with real police.

The ACLU posted a video supporting men in women's sports -- but foolishly allowed public comments, which show how far out of step their position is with the public.

Did Melania have the hottest documentary opening in over ten years?

This scumbag wants to delay your retirement so the obscenely rich don't have to give up a little of their tax cuts.

Those Waymo self-driving robotaxis are largely being remote-controlled by operators in the Philippines and elsewhere.  From now on, anytime you see any demonstration of "autonomous" robots or "self-driving" anything, you should assume it's being faked unless absolutely proven otherwise.

The economy is supposedly "booming", but job growth is in the toilet -- which means the real economy most people live in isn't booming at all.  Trump's trade wars are also ruining farmers.

"Could you ever have guessed that you'd see grown adults proudly humiliate themselves like this?"

A hundred-billion-dollar "AI" deal has collapsed, threatening the fake industry's circular-financing scam.

There he goes again, pointlessly pissing off the neighbors.

Bitcoin's value has fallen so far that it's becoming uneconomical to "mine" it.  How low will it go?  Time to do some pointing and laughing.

Anti-Semitic crimes are now the most common type of hate crime in Massachusetts.

The Epstein story just keeps on getting worse, and the DoJ is still hiding things, including client names.  Keep up the pressure.

ICE agents speak out, and it's a bit surprising.  Others complain they're not even being paid as agreed.

Even places far from Minnesota, such as suburban New Jersey, are preparing for possible future ICE attacks.

"Suck my....." (keep reading to the end).

The recent batch of Epstein documents contains an allegation about Trump which is too gross to describe on this blog.  Here's a deep-dive overview.

A number of prominent people have lost jobs after their links with Epstein were revealed.  But we still need hard evidence of who was actually committing child abuse.

Gun-rights activists are threatening to not vote for Republicans in November due to Trump and his toadies' attacks on Alex Pretti for being armed.  And now US attorney Jeanne Pirro is declaring all-out war on the Second Amendment.

Here, in detail, is why Trump cannot cancel elections.  Not just doesn't have the legal authority to do it, but can't do it.

Republicans are freaking out over the collapse of their Hispanic support, particularly in Texas.

"The public wasn't mad at phantom inflation, they were mad at real inflation that the 'experts' didn't see."

Democrats are being politically smart about ICE, focusing on law and order rather than coddling illegal immigration which the public opposes.

Epstein victims are receiving death threats and harassment due to the DoJ's incompetent failure to properly protect their identities when releasing documents.

Sounds like ICE hasn't improved (found via Earth-Bound Misfit).

Celebrate oppression!  Or, read some no-holds-barred sanity from Masih Alinejad.

Elon Musk is on the defensive as the truth about his ties with Epstein emerges.  More here, plus some other billionaires.

Schumer beat the Republicans, getting most of the government funded and avoiding a shutdown while isolating DHS funding to be settled later, with the Republicans no longer having the threat of a shutdown as leverage.  And the progs still aren't happy.  These lunatics seem to want a shutdown -- want federal workers to go unpaid and millions of SNAP recipients to get their benefits cut off -- as a display of machismo or something.  The Democrats must stand up to them, and protect the American people from them.

"Don't believe for a second that these people care about victims.  They only care about themselves."  Here's what really happened.

Giving credit where due:  Mamdani has forced food-delivery companies in New York to pay over five million dollars in fines and wage restitution for cheating workers out of their pay -- and is shutting down the city's expensive, worthless chatbot.

"The uncomfortable truth is that the president of the United States is a man with the mind of a spoiled child."

ICE murders in Minneapolis are inspiring more and more people across the US to join resistance groups.

"Islam treats women like shit, and we do get to say that."

This woman won a two-million-dollar settlement against the quacks who gave her a double mastectomy at sixteen (they had pressured her parents into consenting).  That hardly seems enough, but it's a win -- hopefully the first of many.

During Mamdani's first month in office, anti-Jewish hate crimes in New York city nearly tripled compared to the same month last year.

Foreign investors are abandoning US stocks, hoping to escape the risks of Trump's economic bungling and the eventual collapse of the "AI" bubble.

The causes of violence against women need to be faced honestly.

No, there is not a Christian revival in the UK ("opt-in" surveys are worthless -- you can't get a valid random sample that way).

Despite the British Supreme Court ruling last year, some of the trans nonsense is still continuing over there.

Taking the Epstein scandal seriously:  the British prime minister is at risk of losing his job, not because he's suspected of ties to Epstein (he isn't), but because he promoted the career of another politician who did have such ties.  There's a remarkable contrast between European and American handling of the scandal.

The UK's nativist party is opening up to environmentalism -- quite a few potential nativist voters are also concerned about the environment.

Threats from Russia and the US mean it's time for an independent Scandinavian nuclear deterrent.

Trump caved on Greenland after Denmark and Sweden showed him how Europe could wipe the floor with the US in an all-out economic clash.

French cyber-police have raided the French offices of Twitter to investigate its facilitation of kiddie porn.  Apparently laws over there still apply, even to rich corporations.

Europe is learning that it must resist Trump, not appease him -- and it has powerful economic tools for doing so.  It wasn't actually difficult to force him to back down on Greenland, once Europeans put their foot down.

European countries are exploring how to handle military data without using any US technology, since the US can no longer be trusted.  The same issue is influencing weapons procurement.  Europe is now looking to India as a source for some kinds of military hardware.

In the EU, electric cars are now outselling gasoline cars for the first time.

Here are the countries Russians perceive as enemies.

A "two-state solution" in Israel is a malignant delusion that needs to be abandoned.

The Iranian theocracy is terrorizing doctors who treated injured protesters.

More links at Red State BluesAngry Bear, and Comedy Plus.

My posts this week:  some truths and inspirations, the "Trappers" video, and a political warning for out-of-touch Democrats.

o o o o o





o o o o o

05 February 2026

A political warning

The Democrats face a fundamental problem which the ideological left is determined to avoid addressing -- and has succeeded in not addressing, largely because Republicans make it easy for them to evade and deny the issues.  But the problem will not go away.

In brief, the ideological left, to which the Democratic party is largely beholden, has embraced a world-view and a set of beliefs and positions which are fundamentally repulsive to the great majority of American voters.  This ideology would, under normal conditions, reduce the Democrats to a permanent minor party on the fringes of politics.  However, the current conditions are not normal.  Since 2016, Donald Trump has been the dominant figure on the US right wing -- a figure often so repulsive and frightening as to make many mainstream voters feel they must vote for the Democrats because they are the only available alternative.

This means the Democrats keep winning elections much of the time, which enables them to avoid confronting the problems caused by their fringe ideology.  But the Republicans won't keep playing this role forever.  Given his obvious health issues, Trump seems unlikely to be around beyond a few more months (and even if I'm wrong about that, he will leave the presidency in January 2029 at the latest), and after he is gone, his influence on the right will fade as more election-savvy figures take over.  Once the Republicans scrub their image of Trump's corruption and lunacy and menace, the Democrats are doomed, unless they have reformed by then.

This NYT article details some major facets of the problem, and is worth reading by anyone who cares about the country's political future.  It quotes a range of other thinkers who are coming to grips with various aspects of the problem, starting with Yascha Mounk:

Democrats would be extremely foolish to think that the temporary advantage given to them by Trump's unpopularity amounts to a permanent fix of their deeply rooted image problem.  The party's favorability ratings remain at record lows.  And while Democrats may temporarily be de-emphasizing some of the rhetoric that made them so unpopular, most voters do not believe that they have had a real change of heart about wokeness or D.E.I. -- much less that they have a coherent set of political ideas to fill the resulting vacuum.

This reflects the trends I've documented with numerous links on this blog over the years.  The ideological left continues to try to defend "wokeness" (often by re-defining it in innocuous-sounding ways which ignore what everybody knows are the objections to it) and identity politics, while name-calling all opposition as racist -- and they cannot get out of their echo chamber to perceive how horribly toxic such efforts are.  The article next cites a study by a Democratic PAC on word frequency in party platforms:

The authors tracked key word usage in Democratic platforms from 2012 to 2024 and found the frequency of the word "hate" increasing by 1,323 percent; "white/Black/Latino/Latina" by 1,137 percent; "L.G.B.T./L.G.B.T.Q.I.+" by 1,044 percent; and "equity" by 766 percent.  Over the same period, usage of "father/fathers" fell 100 percent; "crime/criminal" by 30 percent; "responsibility" by 83 percent; "middle class" by 79 percent; and "veteran" by 31 percent.

That is, there was a huge growth in emphasis on identity politics, groupism, and collectivist concepts of society and justice, but a loss of interest in the kinds of social issues that actually concern mainstream voters.

This part, I think, gets down to the core problem:

.....what Yglesias argued are the fundamental tenets of liberalism..... the view that the basic unit of moral concern is the individual; that institutions should be governed by general, neutral rules; and that rights and due process are core to justice.  The illiberal ideas I'm critiquing, on the other hand, treat groups -- particularly racial, gender and sexual identities -- as the real subjects of politics, see "neutral" rules as a cover for domination by whites and men, and redefine justice as rebalancing power between groups rather than protecting the freedoms and rights of all individuals.

It is utterly inconceivable that a society embracing those "illiberal ideas" could remain free, tolerable to live in, or democratic in any meaningful sense.  Normal people viscerally understand that.  Yet the fixation on such ideas is real.  Most left-ideological sites obsess about identity groups, incessantly describing people as white, black (often capitalized), "brown", "native American" (referring to a specific race, not just everybody who was born in the US), etc, whether those identities are relevant to the actual topic or not.  It's part of the broader problem of clunky, ideological language ("birthing parent", "undocumented", "LGBTQ", "Islamophobic", "social construct", all those preferred pronouns, etc) which makes them sound robotic and 1984-ish -- but worse, it reflects a genuine habit of seeing people mainly as members of identity groups rather than as individuals.

(Trump himself, ironically, is also an exponent of identity politics.  He seeks to whip up and exploit white grievance, not non-white, but the principle at work is the same.)

Next, Noah Smith:

I watched with concern as the quest to end discrimination against Black Americans evolved into a desire to institutionalize discrimination against white Americans in universities, nonprofits, government agencies and many corporations -- something the liberals of the 1990s swore they would never countenance..... I watched as the gay rights movement gave way to a trans movement that was deeply out of step with both America's beliefs and civil rights law.....

The rest of the article discusses academia, giving much more space to it  than its relative importance warrants.  But I strongly recommend reading it.  This is a serious problem, and it's not going to go away unless either the ideological left gets out of its echo chamber and faces reality, or the party decisively repudiates the ideological left.  So long as the party clings to ideas that are repulsive to mainstream voters, it can win only when Republicans insist on being so utterly horrible and terrifying that people have no choice but to hold their noses and vote Democrat.  And the Republicans won't keep on doing that forever.

This year's election is actually a potential trap.  The party not holding the presidency usually makes gains in mid-terms, and lately Trump has been driving the Republicans' "horrible and terrifying" quotient to new heights.  It is very possible that Democrats will win a crushing victory, gaining a huge House majority and even taking the Senate -- and will thus conclude that there is no need to clean up their own act and purge all the nonsense.  And that will set them up for disaster in 2028, when Trump will no longer be on the ballot and the Republicans may well be moving back to normality.

A winning platform is available:  economic populism.  For years surveys have shown massive majorities in favor of a stronger social safety net and higher taxes on the ultra-wealthy.  But the Democrats flat-out refuse to embrace it.  Everyone knows that Republicans stand for more and more tax cuts for billionaires for ever and ever.  But the Democrats have given voters no reason to believe that they stand for restoration of sane tax rates on the rich -- indeed, they have explicitly opposed any steps in that direction.  They are just as captured by billionaire donors as the Republicans are.  Become the party of economic populism and redistribution of wealth back to the workers who create it, instead of the party of identity politics and coddling Islam and men in women's sports and prisons, and they will easily become the overwhelmingly dominant party.  But not otherwise.