03 April 2025

Frequently-confused words

A few years ago, I wrote this post in an effort to help fellow bloggers with words which I often see confused with each other on the internet.  Many people nowadays rely on spell checkers, not realizing that spell checkers are useless for catching this type of error -- all they do is flag strings of letters which are not real words.  If you use an incorrect word which nevertheless is a real word that would be correct in a different context -- for example, saying "reign in" to mean restraining someone's behavior, instead of the correct "rein in" -- a spell checker will not catch this.  Such mistakes are, at least, usually funnier than ordinary spelling errors, but it's still preferable to avoid them.

Here are a few more cases of often-confused or misused words.

censor / censureCensor means to edit or remove writing or art that someone dislikes; it can also mean a person who does this.  Censure means an official reprimand, or the act of imposing one.

click / clique:  A click is a type of sound; a clique is a tight-knit and exclusive group of people.  I have seen "click" used to mean "clique", but this is wrong.

diffuse / defuseDiffuse means vague or thinly-spread, and can (rarely) be a verb meaning to spread out thinly, as in "the gas diffused through the atmosphere".  Defuse is what you do to a bomb to stop it from exploding, and can also be used figuratively to mean calming down a tense situation, as in "the mediator defused the conflict before it escalated into war".

discreet / discreteDiscreet is roughly "secretive" or "confidential", as in "you must handle this discreetly -- don't let anyone know what we're doing".  Discrete is a rare word meaning separate or distinct, as in "this process has several discrete steps".

disperse / disburseDisperse means to thin out or break up something, as in "the police dispersed the crowd", or sometimes to spread out, as in "the immigrants dispersed through the country instead of all settling in one place".  Disburse means to give out money.  The two words are often confused but are quite distinct.

elicit / illicit:  To elicit means to evoke, as in "the speech elicited strong feelings from the audience".  Illicit is an adjective meaning illegal or unethical, as in "a scandal erupted over the politician's illicit behavior".

etc:  This is short for the Latin et cetera, meaning "and so on in the same way".  Spelling it "ect" is incorrect.

faze / phaseFaze is a verb and means to daunt or discourage, and is most often used in the negative -- "he was unfazed by their criticism".  Phase is a noun meaning a stage or period within a larger process; it is also sometimes used as a verb indicating some kind of transition, as in "the program was phased out".  I often see "unphased" used in place of "unfazed", but this doesn't mean anything, unless it means somebody has not been shot with a Star Trek phaser.

kudos:  This word is singular, not plural.  There is no such thing as "a kudo".

moral / moraleMoral means roughly "ethical" and can also refer to ethical standards, as in "he has good morals".  Morale (stressed on the second syllable) means roughly "mood" or "spirit", usually of a group of people; "the soldiers' morale was high as they marched into battle".

pedal / peddlePedal is what you do on a bicycle; to peddle is to try to sell something.  These are sometimes confused in the compound word "backpedal", meaning to retreat or back away, incorrectly written as "backpeddle", which doesn't exist but would presumably mean trying to sell something back to the person you bought it from.

replete / completeReplete with means "full of", with a strong implication of being overstuffed.  It isn't just a fancier version of "complete with" -- it doesn't mean the same thing and should not be used in place of "complete with".

tenant / tenet:  A tenant is a person who lives in rented housing; a tenet is an individual idea which is part of a belief system, for example, "the supremacy of the pope is one of the tenets of Catholicism".

Finally, I should mention the use of early modern English grammatical endings like -th and -st, and pronouns such as thee and thou, to make language sound old-fashioned.  These have standard usage and cannot just be thrown around willy-nilly.  The -th ending is just the older form of the -s which modern English attaches to verbs with a third person singular subject; he worketh, she hath seen it, his behavior annoyeth me, etc.  Saying, for example, "I hath" is ungrammatical; it's exactly the same as "I has".  The -st ending goes with the subject pronoun thou; thou workest, thou hast seen it, etc.  Unlike other personal endings, it is also applied to the past tense; thou didst do it, thou gavest it to me, etc.  This ending is only used with thou.

Thou is the old familiar/informal form of "you".  Thou is used for a grammatical subject, thee for an object, thy or thine for possessive, with the distinction being like "my" vs "mine".  Thus, thou art welcome here, I can see thee, I hear thy words, everything here is thine.  All of these are singular only and can never be used to refer to more than one individual, in contrast to the modern "you" which can be used for one person or several.

If you found this post helpful, please check out the earlier one as well, for more such cases.

9 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

No one can hold back the tide of linguistic drift. Singular "kudo" may eventually be accepted by back-formation in exactly the same way as singular pea (pease from singular French pois) and singular cherry (from singular French cerise)

03 April, 2025 12:19  
Blogger Infidel753 said...

This post is about standard English now (or a few centuries ago, in the case of the early modern English part), and the main point of it is to help people avoid mistakes that could result in their posts being snickered at and taken less seriously.

03 April, 2025 19:25  
Blogger Ami said...

Ohhhh... Peak and Pique has always been one of those that bugs me!!

I know that sometimes people's writing is based on what they've heard rather than what they've read.

I was just talking with my hubby this evening about how spell check doesn't catch it when people write idioms incorrectly, too.

This week I've seen 'nip it in the butt', 'rod iron', 'upmost respect', 'reek havoc' and my personal favorite from yesterday, 'escape goat'.

It *is* sort of humorous, you're right. But people won't take you as seriously if they don't know it's wrong, and it seems like it often is wrong.

03 April, 2025 21:41  
Blogger Rade said...

This reminds me of the New Yorker "The Comma Queen" videos - wonderful!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnAaywvd1uk&list=PLo1TdazaYsoryZnM39HXDB4I9wHBGevy9

04 April, 2025 00:07  
Blogger Infidel753 said...

Ami: Those are good examples. I may have to do another post of these.

Not being taken seriously is exactly the problem. If I'm reading a post or article and I see "bare with me" or "should of known" or "the Mongol hoards", I always think -- if they didn't bother to get that right, what else did they not bother to get right? It legitimately makes the whole thing less trustworthy.

Rade: Good explanation. As you may have noticed, I use what she calls "M-dashes" (written as "--") a lot, and also separate them from the words on each side with a space, to emphasize that they're not hyphens. They really work rather like parentheses in most cases. Some people use an ordinary hyphen in place of that kind of dash, and it really messes up readability since it looks like words are being joined together when they're actually being separated.

04 April, 2025 04:48  
Anonymous Ole phat Stu said...

Meat / meet / meet anybody?

04 April, 2025 06:24  
Blogger Chief Squirrel said...

English is quite difficult to learn. How do you teach someone that “tough” sounds different than ”though” and different yet from “thought” and different still than “through”? We live in a house but go to a live concert. Comb vs tomb? Phone, alone, stone but gone? How did one word (current) come to have different meanings – contemporary and flow? Does someone resume writing a resume? Why do we present a present? Lemon vs demon? I can read a book but I read a good book. Tamales but Females? Before was was was, was was is! I beez glad that I dun learnt it so good.

04 April, 2025 09:26  
Blogger Mary Kirkland said...

Oh these are great. I used to get elicit / illicit wrong all the time. I sometimes get Affect/Effect wrong too.

04 April, 2025 10:06  
Blogger Infidel753 said...

Phat: Yes, that's another example.

Chief: Most of those (and some of my own examples) are issues with the writing system, not the language. Since English (like most languages) has incorporated a lot of foreign words, and in many cases their spellings along with them, there are several conflicting sets of rules for spelling similar sounds.

My concern here is cases where people confuse two different words when writing. This isn't usually due to oddities about spelling, but to confusion about the fact that there even are two different words, or one of the words being rare so that the writer doesn't realize it's a separate word.

Mary: Thanks -- I'm hopeful that it was helpful.

04 April, 2025 22:18  

Post a Comment

Please be on-topic and read the comments policy. Spam, trolls, and fight-pickers will be deleted. If you don't have a Blogspot account and aren't sure how to comment, please see here. Fair warning: anything supporting transgender ideology, or negative toward Brexit, or in favor of a military draft or compulsory national service, will be deleted. I am not obligated to provide a platform for views I find morally abhorrent.

On work days there is likely to be a substantial delay in approving comments, since I can't do blog stuff in an office. For this I apologize.

Please be respectful -- no political comments on non-political posts, please.

<< Home