Potemkin mob
Nevertheless, it's a clever tactic by a regime which is rapidly running out of options. By painting the conflict as being between two opposing groups of civilians, it exploits the media tendency to present any pair of opposing positions as vaguely equivalent in legitimacy regardless of the reality of the situation (such as the media-supported impression that there are "debates" within the scientific community about the reality of evolution or anthropo- genic global warming). In this case, a mob of a few thousand becomes one "side" of a "conflict", with the other being a mass of a million who have many millions more throughout the country behind them. Kudos to CNN for digging a bit deeper.
2 Comments:
I found it interesting that the pro-Mubarak "rioters" were denouncing the US and how they hated America. That one left me scratching my head!! Let's see, the US has been supporting Mubarak politically and financially for 30 years.
Ah well, maybe the confusion is simply because the pro-Mubarak goons can't Google their president right now.
Keeping track of who's on which shit list is probably above their pay grade.
At least I haven't seen much evidence of anti-Western sentiment from the anti-Mubarak protesters. I'm sure they know the US has been propping him up, but they also know that what they want is basically Western-style rights and prosperity.
Post a Comment
Please be on-topic and read the comments policy. Spam, trolls, and fight-pickers will be deleted. If you don't have a Blogspot account and aren't sure how to comment, please see here. Fair warning: anything supporting transgender ideology, or negative toward Brexit, or in favor of a military draft or compulsory national service, will be deleted. I am not obligated to provide a platform for views I find morally abhorrent.
On work days there is likely to be a substantial delay in approving comments, since I can't do blog stuff in an office. For this I apologize.
Please be respectful -- no political comments on non-political posts, please.
<< Home