20 September 2026

Missiles in Arabia, and why it matters to you

The Mideast war is almost certainly about to escalate massively.

About ten days ago, the Houthi rebels in Yemen took control of the Yemeni side of the Bāb al-Mandab.  The Bāb al-Mandab is the narrow strait between the southern corner of Yemen and the southern end of Eritrea (see map above); it connects the Red Sea to the Indian Ocean.  At the opposite, northern end of the Red Sea are the Suez Canal and Israel.

The Houthis, officially called the Ansār Allāh, meaning Partisans of God, are a fanatical Shiite force allied to the Iranian regime (Iran, southern Iraq, and large minorities in Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen are Shiite, while the rest of the Middle East is mostly Sunni); they have been fighting a civil war against the so-called "Presidential Leadership Council" (basically remnants of the former Yemeni government) for years.  The PLC is supported by Saudi Arabia, and the Yemeni civil war is largely a proxy conflict between the Iranian and Saudi regimes.  Here is the Houthi official emblem:

The Arabic translates as:  "God is great, Death to America, Death to Israel, Curse be upon the Jews, Victory to Islam" -- just so you know where these guys are coming from.

The reason all this matters to the rest of the world is that a vast amount of shipping between Europe and Asia goes by way of the Suez Canal and the Bāb al-Mandab, so this strait, like the Strait of Hormuz between Iran and Oman, is a critical global economic choke-point.  The Houthi advance means that the Iranian regime now has de facto control over both straits, increasing its power to inflict economic damage on the West.  Since it is now part of the regime's policy to torment Donald Trump as much as possible, it can be expected to take full advantage of that power.

The Houthis have attacked Saudi Arabia (backers of their enemy the PLC) before, but just this last few days have seen a serious escalation -- a wave of missile strikes deep into Saudi territory.  One ballistic missile was fired at Riyadh, the Saudi capital city, but was shot down.  The red pointers on the map with underlined names are other targets of Houthi missile strikes; it's currently unclear how many missiles got through to these places vs how many were shot down.

The Saudi regime, which is as repressive as the Iranian one but stupider and more fragile, will likely retaliate hard against the Houthis -- an attempt to attack its capital cannot go unanswered.  If the Houthis escalate in response, their next step could include attacks on Saudi oil facilities, which would send global oil prices skyrocketing.

Beyond that, there are some signs that Trump is planning a massive military escalation against Iran.  If this happens and is serious enough, but fails to bring down the Iranian regime entirely, the regime would very likely respond with an all-out attack on Saudi Arabia's entire oil industry, both from Iran itself and from the Houthis, with the aim of wrecking the US and other Western economies.  Iran is certainly capable of devastating strikes -- we now know that in the earlier fighting it inflicted far worse damage on US bases than the US admitted at the time.  Also, Saudi Arabia's Persian Gulf coastal area, where most of its oil is, has a partly Shiite population which is brutally oppressed by the Saudi regime.  It's conceivable that Iran could succeed in inciting an uprising there.

Trump recently tried to reduce upward pressure on oil prices by demanding that Ukraine stop attacking Russian oil refineries, but of course the fact that Trump stupidly started a war with Iran without adequate planning or determination to overthrow the regime is not Ukraine's problem, and its drone strikes on Russian refineries have continued.

Iran has dominated the Middle East for the majority of the period since the founding of the first Persian Empire in the sixth century BCE.  What we see today is a historical norm re-asserting itself.

In attacking the Iranian regime, Trump picked a fight with people far more evil and far more intelligent than he is.  The rest of the world, including the American people, is about to start suffering the full consequences of his blundering.

[The origin of the name "Bāb al-Mandab" is of some interest.  It translates as "The Gate of Lamentation" and originates from the Middle Ages, when the vast Arab slaving network in Africa used to ship black African slaves across the strait to Arabia.  It refers to the lamentation of the slaves at their last sight of Africa before leaving to spend the rest of their lives in servitude in the Islamic world.]

10 Comments:

Blogger Anvilcloud said...

You understand the nature of the region very well, 👍

20 September, 2026 06:12  
Blogger Rade said...

Net: It's bad.

20 September, 2026 09:47  
Blogger Infidel753 said...

Anvil: I would hope so. The Middle East is my main area of expertise, so I write about it because that's where I have something to contribute.

Rade: Well, yes.

20 September, 2026 11:25  
Blogger Tomichan Matheikal said...

Will the WWIII start in the Middle East?

20 September, 2026 19:02  
Blogger Infidel753 said...

Even in the worst-case scenario, it wouldn't be a world war, but a large local war with world-wide economic consequences.

20 September, 2026 20:15  
Anonymous Annie said...

I appreciate this look at the imminent turn for the worse in the Middle East. I have heard that the Saudis have been begging Trump to support them against the Houthis, but he has been reluctant. He seems paralyzed at this point. He knows the war is very unpopular in the US. In addition, though he claims the reports of America's shortage of certain types of weaponry is "fake news," that seems to be the case. Or does your research suggest that such reports of US weapon shortages are overblown?

21 September, 2026 10:12  
Blogger SickoRicko said...

One of my teachers in Junior High school said the next great war will start in in the Middle East. I'm 75, so that prediction was a long time ago.

21 September, 2026 10:40  
Blogger Mary Kirkland said...

Thak you for all the information regarding this. There's so much bad stuff going on in the world right now.

21 September, 2026 12:31  
Blogger Veronica Lee said...

It’s unsettling how quickly conflicts in one region can affect the whole world.
The impact on oil and trade means everyone feels the consequences.

21 September, 2026 20:18  
Blogger Infidel753 said...

Annie: Thanks for the thoughtful comment. I think Trump knows on some level that the war has been bad for him in domestic-politics terms, and is reluctant to get drawn in any further, even to protect the Saudi regime. I don't know whether the US military is running low on weapons, but what Trump says means nothing one way or the other. Seeing how wars these days seem to use up weapons faster than anyone expects, I'm not optimistic. And the Israelis say Iran is rebuilding its armaments remarkably fast. Now Trump is threatening to "annihilate" Iran. If he's thinking about going nuclear, that further suggests that stocks of conventional weapons are running dangerously low.

Ricko: It's certainly possible. I would have pegged India/Pakistan as the most likely flash point, but in that conflict there are only two countries involved, so it's relatively simple. In the Middle East there are so many countries and groups with various conflicts, it's way more complicated and there's more risk of miscalculation.

Mary: Thanks. There certainly is a lot of bad stuff going on -- and notice how much of it stems from religion. Without the Sunni-Shiite rivalry and all the religious fanaticism, it would be far easier to limit conflicts and arrive at peaceful solutions.

Veronica: It's unfortunate that so much of the world's oil is concentrated in a place with so many religious conflicts and unstable authoritarian governments. It really does mean that the region's problems become everybody's problems.

21 September, 2026 23:25  

Post a Comment

Please be on-topic and read the comments policy. Spam, trolls, and fight-pickers will be deleted. If you don't have a Blogspot account and aren't sure how to comment, please see here. Fair warning -- I reject all comments containing any of the following:

1. Support for transgenderism
2. Negativity about Brexit
3. Support for a military draft or compulsory national service

I am not obligated to provide a platform for views I find morally abhorrent. And obviously I'm going to delete anything which is just quoting what an "AI" said. I want to hear from you, not from the always-wrong hallucination machine.

No comments advocating violence against any specific identifiable individual, even jokingly.

Please be considerate -- no political or politics-tinged comments on non-political posts, and no performative cynicism. Finally, please remember that this is a personal blog whose main purpose is to encourage contact from people with similar interests and world-views to mine. I really don't much care for arguing and debating; if arguing and debating is what you want, there are plenty of other places on the internet which welcome that.

From now until the finalization of the election results, no comments claiming the Republicans (or Democrats) will or can "steal" the election. It's pointless to engage with such stuff, and it promotes defeatism, which makes people less likely to vote or otherwise be politically active.

<< Home