Political alienation strikes again
This is a blogger I've known online for several years, though we never met in person (geographical distance would have made that impractical). She was particularly supportive when I was going through near-suicidal depression a couple of years ago, and went out of her way to contact me at some particularly bad times to see how I was doing. She is, however, intensely politically committed, sticking closely to what might be described as the "orthodox" set of left-wing viewpoints. As I, over the last few years, became increasingly alienated from the orthodox left over issues like trans ideology, extremist rhetoric, the failure to condemn anti-Semitism, and most recently the Democrats joining forces with the Republicans to attack voting rights via gerrymandering, the relationship grew somewhat strained. Still I valued it enough that a couple of months ago, after I'd made what I realized was an excessively harsh response to a comment she left on my blog, I wrote to apologize and try to mend fences. I've read about cases of people just cutting off someone they know because of political differences, but it wouldn't have occurred to me to do that myself.
Nine days ago I left a comment on one of her posts and she wrote an approving response to it. The next day I noticed that it had disappeared, and tried to leave another comment to let her know -- I assumed it as a glitch in the comments function on her blog, as that had happened before. The comment didn't appear, so I sent an e-mail. On Wednesday, not having gotten any response, I sent another. I haven't gotten any response to that one either. It seems she has simply cut off contact.
I can only assume this was due to political disagreement, but I don't know what the specific trigger was. The comment I left on her blog was completely innocuous, and nothing I posted here last weekend or immediately before was out of line with what I've been saying all along. But she is, as I said, very politics-focused, and it could be that some particular turn of phrase I didn't think was significant was too much for her. This is somewhat upsetting because she had been so supportive in earlier years. I certainly never imagined that she would just end all contact and not even tell me what the issue was.
I have to admit that I do not, and really can not, understand the mind-set that is so focused on politics that political differences can destroy actual relationships with people. There are people with whom I manage to maintain fairly good relations despite substantial political disagreements, such as Darrell Michaels and Rade. It just takes a recognition of the obvious fact that there is much more to a person than their political opinions, a mutual willingness to refrain from badgering each other with efforts to "convert" them to one's own viewpoint, and enough sense to not take things personally which are written about as general matters (as opposed to explicit personal attacks or insults). This seems obvious and normal even though, as I posted about earlier, there are elements in my personal history which make me somewhat inept at handling social relationships. The mentality that allows politics to dominate such relationships is totally alien to me.
It's a reminder that I need to work harder on breaking out of the social isolation I've existed in for the last few years. It's just not healthy for your only relationships to be online ones with people you've never actually even met.
[Please, no naming names in the comments even if you can tell who I'm talking about. I don't have any ill-will toward her and don't want to make this about personalities.]


4 Comments:
People shouldn’t just ghost one another and leave the person hanging in confusion. I think it is mostly cowardly.
I’m sorry this happened. I confess that I have also done this ghosting (and have had it done to me). I just felt that the person had to know why and there was no point in further discussion. I don’t know your situation, of course, but in mine I felt that I was being deliberately trolled in two separate cases, one on the far right and one on the far left, amusingly enough, in order for the person to “show off” in front of other friends, which I found frankly humiliating. If it had been a serious conversation (in either case), I might not have done it. Sometimes when I feel emotionally stressed, it’s just too much to engage in conversation over hot topics, so perhaps your (former) friend similarly felt overloaded and past her limit of engagement. It’s possible she will respond to your email when she feels better. I hope so!
Oh my. Idunno, Infidel - I sit in this world with the fundamental understanding that I don't know enough about everything to profess an accurate opinion about most anything. I believe the term that I like to apply to myself is; "Blissfully ignorant". I blog to share memes and comics, to offer some observations on matters of planet, stupidity and wealth. To perform due diligence with research and references when posting a missive. To accept constructive criticism and opinions when they either augment the post or provide a balanced counterpoint to the commentary. It's why I appreciate our relationship! But to ghost someone because their viewpoint not aligned with a specific world view... that's just sad. At least have the decency to tell the person, personally, the why.
Given your history with this person, and the benefit they have been in your life, I will hedge that it may be something as innocuous as "my computer / internet crashed in mid-sentence" (not like that has never happened). Or like Debra (She Who Seeks); away, REALLY AWAY, on vacation.
I hope these things find a healthy resolve.
Rade
Anvil: I certainly wouldn't, nor consider it acceptable behavior from someone else, in a case where there was an amicable relationship going back years. But it's depressingly common.
Paula: It sounds like you were under personal attack, of a sort. I don't think things I wrote on my own blog, directed at a general audience and not targeting any particular individual, could reasonably be construed the same way.
She's been posting on her own blog during the whole week when this stuff was happening, and seems to be in good spirits, not overloaded or depressed about anything. I know people sometimes can come across that way even when they have bad stuff going on, but it's all I have to go by.
Rade: It's admirable modesty. Lots of people claim more certainty than they can justify. I think I can write authoritatively on a few areas where I really do know more than most people -- the Middle East, basic science -- but in most areas I have to be cautious.
If she hadn't been active on the internet at all during this time, the possibility of her internet being down is the first explanation I'd go for, but as I mentioned to Paula above, she's been posting on her blog. Knowing this person as I do, the more I think about it, the more plausible it seems that she simply decided she didn't want to go on interacting with somebody who didn't have the same political views in even some areas.
Post a Comment
Please be on-topic and read the comments policy. Spam, trolls, and fight-pickers will be deleted. If you don't have a Blogspot account and aren't sure how to comment, please see here. Fair warning: anything supporting transgender ideology, or negative toward Brexit, or in favor of a military draft or compulsory national service, will be deleted. I am not obligated to provide a platform for views I find morally abhorrent.
No comments advocating violence against any specific identifiable individual, even jokingly.
Please be considerate -- no political or politics-tinged comments on non-political posts, and no performative cynicism. Finally, please remember that this is a personal blog whose main purpose is to encourage contact from people with similar interests and world-views to mine. I really don't much care for arguing and debating; if arguing and debating is what you want, there are plenty of other places on the internet which welcome that.
<< Home