04 June 2026

The forgotten man

It's difficult to keep perspective on historical events while one is living through them.  The events of the present moment always seem to be of epic significance, the current personalities to be giants whose names will echo through the generations to come.  Every president, king, and prime minister in history probably seemed like an imposing figure during his term in power, even though the vast majority of them are hardly remembered today.

Our own era is no different.  People today assign to current events in general, and Donald Trump in particular, a historic significance wholly unwarranted by reality.  I've seen people make claims like "our country has never been so divided as it is today" -- a country which, within its relatively short history, has seen a civil war that left six hundred thousand dead and one-third of our territory in ruins.  Trump's abuses and attacks on freedom are held by some to be of historic magnitude -- in a nation which has seen slavery, the mass deportations and expropriations of the Indians, the Jim Crow era, the military draft, and the Vietnam war.

Many today seem to assume that Trump will be remembered as a major historical figure, for good or evil.  I just don't see it.  There's nothing about Trump or his deeds that will make him particularly memorable or important in the long term.

People remember presidents who achieved things.  Washington won our national independence.  Jefferson played a huge role in creating the institutions and norms that make the US what it is.  Lincoln crushed the Confederate insurrection and ended slavery.  FDR ended the Great Depression, won World War II, and built the beginnings of the (still threadbare by modern standards) social safety net we have now.

Trump has not achieved anything comparable.  His sole major positive accomplishment was Operation Warp Speed in 2020, to accelerate the development of covid vaccines; while praiseworthy, this is hardly comparable to ending slavery or crushing Japanese imperialism.  Trump has mostly created problems, not solved them.  He has damaged trade and the economy with his tariffs, defunded science, put ignorant anti-vaccine quacks in charge of the federal health system, consolidated political polarization and the dominance of party loyalty, prioritized his personal vendettas over policy, attacked democracy by supporting gerrymandering, polluted our political discourse with gross, toddler-level vulgarity, antagonized our fellow democracies by threatening and picking fights with them, undermined NATO, weakened US support for Ukraine and (more recently) for Israel, emboldened dictators by cozying up to them, and on and on.

His great achievement was supposed to be dealing with illegal migrants.  A solid majority of Americans want mass deportation of all illegals, not just the criminals, but ICE's flagrant violations of due process and core Constitutional rights, its thuggishness and cruelty, and its inclusion of US citizens in its dragnets have rightly turned the public against it; the real solution to this problem will have to wait for another president who can handle it properly.  He had another chance to achieve greatness by attacking the Iranian theocracy and helping the Iranian people overthrow it, but instead seems to be repeating the classic error of US Middle East policy -- stopping military action before the job is done, thus allowing the enemy to recover, re-arm, and (in this case) re-assert its tyranny over Iran.

Trump can't even serve as an inspirational figure.  Everything about him is small -- petty, mean, spiteful, squalid, boastful, and vulgar.  There is no greatness in him, not even great evil.  He cannot even claim authorship of some epic crime to match, say, the Trail of Tears.

On some level he seems to be aware of this.  Surely knowing his remaining time is short, he is frantically trying to slap his name on important buildings and his face on commemorative coins, a $250 bill, and anything else he can think of.  He is obsessed with defacing DC with monumental kitsch like his arch and ballroom.  But leaders are not actually remembered for such things.

o o o o o

Time has a way of filtering out the chaff and preserving what is truly important.  Look at history.  What is remembered today?

Pretty much everybody today remembers the name of Galileo and knows something about his great achievements.  No one except specialist historians knows the name of the pope who persecuted him.  Everyone knows who Darwin was, but almost nobody could tell you who was the king or prime minister of Britain in Darwin's time.  Chaucer, Jane Austen, and Mary Shelley are better known today than the rulers under which they lived.

Two or three centuries in the future, who will be remembered from our own time?  Stephen Hawking and Richard Dawkins, almost certainly.  Jane Goodall and Steven Pinker, quite likely.  JK Rowling and Guillermo del Toro, possibly.  Maybe even Taylor Swift.  Trump will be forgotten, except among the kind of people who actually, seriously know who James K Polk and Millard Fillmore were.

What we remember is the great achievers.  Rather rarely, political leaders rank among them. We also remember the great criminals.  Rather more often, political leaders rank among those.  Trump will not, in either case.

15 Comments:

Blogger Rade said...

Good essay, Infidel. I concur with your observations.

All of the destruction, all of the taint on our democracy can be rebuilt and scrubbed down to a dull reminder; a footnote. Where I am saddened is that we are a society that suffers from short term memory; we are not learning from past, we're not accepting mistakes (foreign or domestic) or making any impactful changes to ensure we, as a country, can break the cycles of hatred that seem to permeate our underbelly and percolate up every so many decades.

I can only look at T*ump as the toxin that America needed; to shake us, as a country, as a democracy, to our core - to wake us up on just how precarious this institution is. We became complacent; not being involved... not paying attention... NOT VOTING. Perhaps this was the slap on the face we need? America has certainly lost it's footing on the global stage - it will take a lot of humility and effort to repair that.

Time will only tell; whatever comes of the next two general election cycles will determine our fate. Will we use Hungary as the template to restore and rebuild; to "de-Trump" and move on? To welcome the adults back into the room? Sadly, in 2024, with the decision between a black woman with a positive history of civil service, and a thrice-convicted felon promising "dictatorship on day one...", only 65.3% (about 154m) of the eligible population actually came out to vote. (source: https://www.census.gov/)

Perhaps his time in office will be a short-term cure for the overt apathy in the electorate?

04 June, 2026 02:00  
Blogger Anvilcloud said...

I think the stench will last for awhile, as it certainly should. Longer term., let us hope that you are correct. When he is gone, let us erase as many stains as possible.

04 June, 2026 06:39  
Anonymous marcel proust said...

I agree with the basic point about those who have made fundamental and important contributions to science or culture leaving a longer lasting imprint in the popular memory, but I think your examples are heavily biased to what we consider important today. Galileo and Newton were not the most well known or prominent figures in natural philosophy during their lifetimes; google Cesare Cremonini (who?)

I will put my responses in ALL CAPS, not to shout but to distinguish my comments from the OP

******************

... but almost nobody could tell you who was the king or prime minister of Britain in Darwin's time.

OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD: QUEEN VICTORIA AND MOST LIKELY PALMERSTON & DISRAELI. (CHECKING, I REALIZED THAT I HAD FORGOTTEN GLADSTONE, ALMOST AS WELL KNOWN AS THE OTHER 2. ALSO 2 OTHERS WHOSE NAMES I DO NOT KNOW)

Two or three centuries in the future, who will be remembered from our own time? Stephen Hawking and Richard Dawkins, almost certainly.

UNLIKELY. DAWKINS IS AN EXCELLENT PUBLICIST BUT NOT ESPECIALLY PROMINENT AMONG THOSE WHO HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO GENETICS OR GENETIC THEORY. MORE LIKELY CRICK AND WATSON; PERHAPS TRIVERS &/OR HAMILTON AMONG BIOLOGISTS. AMONG PHYSICISTS, FEYNMAN, BARDEEN, MAYBE HAWKING? JOHN NASH OR von NEUMANN?

Jane Goodall and Steven Pinker, quite likely. JK Rowling and Guillermo del Toro, possibly. Maybe even Taylor Swift.

AGAIN, YOU LEAN TOO HEAVILY ON THOSE KNOWN TO THE CONTEMPORARY LAY PUBLIC RATHER THAN THOSE WHO HAVE MADE FUNDAMENTAL CONTRIBUTIONS ALONG THE LINES OF GALILEO AND NEWTON.

04 June, 2026 07:55  
Blogger Infidel753 said...

Rade: I really doubt that Trump brought any substantial benefit. Showing us how fragile democracy is? He showed the opposite -- he did everything he could to undermine it and he failed. Elections still run normally and the results are generally accepted. The worst danger to democracy right now is gerrymandering, which robs voters of the right to cast a meaningful vote in House races. Arguably even that is less anti-democratic than the earlier norm of women and blacks not being allowed to vote.

Anvil: I hope once he's gone his name will be taken off all the stuff he stuck it on, and the physical damage to DC will be repaired as much as possible. We don't need memorials to a corrupt asshole who was a mediocre president at best.

04 June, 2026 08:49  
Blogger nick said...

I think you're right that it's the achievers who're remembered. But even the achievers aren't always remembered. How many Brits recall Atlee and how he established the modern welfare state, created the NHS, and began the decolonization of the British Empire?

04 June, 2026 08:51  
Blogger Infidel753 said...

Marcel: I think your examples are heavily biased to what we consider important today. Galileo and Newton were not the most well known or prominent figures in natural philosophy during their lifetimes

That's my point. People at the time aren't the best judge of what is important or worth remembering. The long-term perspective is often quite different. What we today judge most important, similarly, may not be what the future judges most important.

You're wrong about Dawkins, but that's a bigger issue than would be appropriate to go into here. I also think Hawking is more significant than you give him credit for. In any case I used examples that would be instantly recognizable to most readers, so my point would be clear without burdensome explanations.

In the case of Goodall, Rowling, Pinker, etc, I was partly relying on the importance of their broad popular influence, which can matter more to their long-term cultural impact (and thus likelihood of being remembered) than going purely by the scientific significance of what they did (as for writers, objective quality of writing is always hard to judge objectively, but there's no doubt that Rowling, for example, has had a huge impact on mass culture).

In any case, my general point -- that thinkers and writers tend to be better remembered than political leaders, compared with what their contemporaries would expect -- remains valid.

Do not write stuff in all caps in the comments here again. I'll delete them.

04 June, 2026 09:01  
Blogger Infidel753 said...

Nick: It's true that some significant achievers are not remembered very well. In Attlee's case, it would be hard for anyone to stand out so close in time to the mammoth impact of Churchill and World War II -- and he's really too recent to speak of today's impressions of him as constituting any sort of verdict of history. In any case, my general point -- that thinkers and writers tend to be better remembered than political leaders, compared with what their contemporaries would expect -- remains valid.

04 June, 2026 09:07  
Blogger SickoRicko said...

Well said.

04 June, 2026 12:19  
Blogger Paula said...

I hope he’s forgotten, the sooner the better, and his face and name consigned to the trash bin with the Kardashians. But that will probably be after I’m gone because right now people can’t stop talking about him everywhere 😜

04 June, 2026 13:12  
Blogger Mary Kirkland said...

Living through all this stuff and waiting 10 or even 15 years to see what people remember the most of this time will be interesting.

04 June, 2026 15:46  
Blogger Al Penwasser said...

I agree-spot on. The only area of disagreement (and an arguable one) is that FDR didn't end the Great Depression. WWII did. But, a point of debate, nonetheless.
I so hope we can put recent years behind us.

04 June, 2026 18:40  
Blogger Ami said...

Thanks for this. I can see your point(s).

And in my entire life there's been nothing I can do about the shit they get up to in "our" government. It's just that we've never had so many people in charge who put cruelty first. And of course in large quantities. It's emotionally overloading for me. And I take it personally, many of the children in my care are various shades of brown, and some of them are utterly terrified of losing a parent or relative. Even the ones with parents who were born here are afraid. I find the mama bear instinct has caused me a lot of anger when I think about the threats to 'my' kids.

You're right though. He will eventually be gone, and so will his enablers and co-defendants. Not soon enough, but eventually. And history will turn the page and we'll move on to the next thing.

Today would be good.

04 June, 2026 20:46  
Blogger Infidel753 said...

Ricko: Thanks.

Paula: The obsession with talking about Trump is weird. I've seen people claim they're "tuning him out" and then just go on ranting about him.

If there's one group I'm sure history will not remember, it's the Kardashians. I never read anything about them so I don't even know what they're "famous" for.

Mary: It will be. Perceptions don't usually change much in such a short time, but I hope to see the day when everybody recognizes that "AI" was a scam.

Al: I hope we can put the extreme political polarization behind us and re-unify the country. People will always disagree about policy, but this demonization of people with different views is horribly toxic (and largely fomented by Russia).

Ami: It's a very scary time. At least ICE hasn't been especially active in Oregon.

I really think Trump won't be with us much longer. His physical and mental deterioration is really obvious. For younger people it may even seem strange for a while when he's gone, after he's dominated US politics for ten years.

05 June, 2026 00:38  
Blogger NickM said...

That's quite a polemic. I like it.

It reminds me of this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnN_JoIBkzw

05 June, 2026 00:45  
Blogger Infidel753 said...

He'd make that line-up.

05 June, 2026 21:10  

Post a Comment

Please be on-topic and read the comments policy. Spam, trolls, and fight-pickers will be deleted. If you don't have a Blogspot account and aren't sure how to comment, please see here. Fair warning: anything supporting transgender ideology, or negative toward Brexit, or in favor of a military draft or compulsory national service, will be deleted. I am not obligated to provide a platform for views I find morally abhorrent.

No comments advocating violence against any specific identifiable individual, even jokingly.

Please be considerate -- no political or politics-tinged comments on non-political posts, and no performative cynicism. Finally, please remember that this is a personal blog whose main purpose is to encourage contact from people with similar interests and world-views to mine. I really don't much care for arguing and debating; if arguing and debating is what you want, there are plenty of other places on the internet which welcome that.

<< Home