05 November 2025

The election

I suppose I need to say something about this.  The two major disasters yesterday were expected, even inevitable, but that doesn't make the disappointment any less.

Mamdani, who has emerged as something of a messiah figure (if one may use such a term) for left-wing anti-Semitism in the US, was elected mayor of the city with the largest Jewish population in the country.  Before the events of two years ago, I would have confidently said that this simply could not happen.  But as Judenhass in various forms has become more pervasive, open, and normalized on both the right and the left, the Overton window has shifted, frighteningly so.  On the right, at least there are influential voices willing to condemn anti-Semitism and fight those who legitimize it, most recently over Tucker Carlson giving a sympathetic platform to Nick Fuentes (more here).  On the left, neither the leadership nor the activist blogosphere will condemn or even acknowledge what is happening.

So a man who (as I've shown with several links in the last few link round-ups) refuses to condemn jihadist slogans calling for the mass killing of Jews, accuses Israel of "genocide" over its almost inhumanly restrained response to the October 7 horror, has threatened to arrest Netanyahu if he ever comes to New York, and is now threatening to defund the New York campus of Israel's Technion university -- is being accepted and discussed as if he were simply a normal politician.  We are still a long way from Germany of 1933, but this is definitely one more step along the road in that direction.

Nearly half of New Yorkers believe Mamdani will turn the city into a cesspit of rising crime and bigotry and economic stagnation.  If the opposition had not been divided between two candidates (crummy ones at that), perhaps he could have been stopped.  But what's done is done and we are stuck with it.

Equally disastrous, the political parties' unified war against democracy won a major victory in California with the passage of Proposition 50, which will allow the legislature to rig the state's Congressional districts to ensure the best possible outcome for the ruling party regardless of how the voters vote -- exactly as Republicans have done (without even a referendum) in Texas.  Some people worry that Trump might cancel elections in the future (which he can't -- elections are run by the states, not by the federal government), but this plague of gerrymandering is achieving the same de facto result by making elections meaningless, as far as the House of Representatives is concerned.  The two parties are collaborating to reduce the country to a patchwork of fiefdoms in which almost every seat is a safe seat for the dominant party in the state, and the election outcome is dictated in advance regardless of what we the voters want.

Yes, I am very well aware of all the arguments in favor of this that are circulating on the activist fringe.  I've had plenty of opportunity to read them over the last few weeks.  The best that can be said of them is that they're pathetically naïve.  I'll refrain from saying what I really think of them, to avoid burning any last remaining bridges and possibly getting this blog shut down.

I don't think I've ever failed to vote in a single election in the 47 years since I was old enough to vote, and I have always taken the view that people who don't bother to vote have no business complaining if they don't like the outcome.  But for the first time, it seems futile.  With both parties openly and explicitly attacking democracy and conspiring to make our votes meaningless, what is there to vote for?

Yes, there were also some other state and local races elsewhere in the country, and Democrats won most of them, which I suppose is a good thing.  But in the face of the disasters in New York and California, that hardly feels relevant.

Meanwhile, the stupid dick-measuring contest in Congress over the shutdown is still dragging on.  Everyone in power or in the activist fringes cares only about whether their side wins.  Not about all the millions of ordinary people being forced into increasingly desperate straits because of the shutdown.

I know that American democracy has faced much worse threats and more damaging situations in the past, but this is the worst it has been in my lifetime.  I feel physically nauseated.

[Note:  Any comments along the lines of "Yes, Trump can cancel the elections" will just be deleted.  I'm not going to get threadjacked into debating the political equivalent of flat-Earthism.]

12 Comments:

Blogger Anvilcloud said...

Nothing seems normal down there anymore.

05 November, 2025 06:21  
Anonymous rick shapiro said...

I think that you are overthinking the redistricting efforts. They are partisan; but no more so than those that occur after a census. In themselves, they don't have a meaningful effect on movements to minimize partisanship in district layouts.
Furthermore, these particular redistrictings, which are intended to reduce the number of opposite party representatives, actually reduce the number of safe seats for either party; because they reduce the margin of safety of previously safe seats, by redistributing opposite party voters into districts of the favored party.

05 November, 2025 07:30  
Blogger Infidel753 said...

Anvil: It's disturbing. I wonder if there is still a non-violent way of overcoming this partisan power grab.

Rick: These super-gerrymanders, such as in Texas and California, are specifically intended to be more partisan than the redistricting that happens after censuses, since they are specifically designed to make the maps more partisan than the existing maps which were drawn after the last census -- and they are universally recognized as indeed having that effect.

They are specifically intended to maximize partisanship in district layouts, by increasing the number of seats which will almost certainly be won by the state dominant party (Republicans in Texas, Democrats in California) -- and they are universally recognized as indeed having that effect.

That is to say, they are specifically intended to increase the number of safe seats for the ruling party in each case -- seats which are almost certain to be won by a given party. The reduction of the margin of safety to which you refer is just that -- it doesn't reduce the number of safe seats, just makes them slightly less safe as a by-product of increasing the number of safe seats. Reducing the margin of safety only matters in unusual situations like a landslide election for one side or the other. It's remotely possible that there could be a landslide election in 2026, in which case the Republican redistricting in Texas could indeed be counter-productive, but in a normal election year all this gerrymandering has exactly the effect I described -- it makes the result in most seat a forgone conclusion and thus makes the voters' intentions meaningless.

This is a power grab by the political parties to put themselves, rather than the voters, in the position of dictating election outcomes. It's an open, blatant, explicit bipartisan attack on democracy itself.

05 November, 2025 09:15  
Blogger Rade said...

I have no qualms with supporting Zohran; he's not an old, white, millionaire looking to score points in the clubhouse after 18 holes or with his besties in the Hamptons. Let's re-evaluate after gets a term in office under his belt.

05 November, 2025 09:41  
Blogger nick said...

I didn't know Mamdani was anti-semitic. In that case his election is not the triumph I assumed it was. I don't see why people think he'll cause rising crime and bigotry and economic stagnation. Why do they think that?

05 November, 2025 09:44  
Blogger Infidel753 said...

Rade: I've amply documented Mamdani's anti-Semitism in the last few weeks' link round-ups. If you not only support an anti-Semitic candidate but have no qualms about doing so, then you're part of that "normalization" issue I mentioned in paragraph 3. It's no different than supporting David Duke on the basis of his economic views when he ran for office in Louisiana (and suggesting he be re-evaluated after a term in office), ignoring his KKK background. And if you think it matters that Mamdani isn't white, that's just stone-cold racist.

Nick: Again, I've posted plenty of links concerning Mamdani's anti-Semitism. If you actually look at the link I gave in this post, you'll see why people have the expectations of him that they do. Anti-Semitism is in itself a form of bigotry. Soft-on-crime policies lead to more crime, and some of his policies would make crime harder for poor people to get away from. If the crime and anti-Semitism drive some of the more productive people out of New York, it's likely to lead to economic stagnation. Where I live (Portland OR) intolerable levels of petty crime have been driving businesses out of the downtown for years. It's hardly a surprising phenomenon.

05 November, 2025 12:28  
Blogger Mary Kirkland said...

I've always voted since I was able to. seeing what's happening is just mind boggling.

06 November, 2025 14:01  
Blogger Infidel753 said...

Yep.

07 November, 2025 03:39  
Blogger J roc said...

I live in the UK less than 3 miles from Villa Park. The police banned Maccabi Tel Aviv fans because of their hooliganism, as did the Tel Aviv police when Maccabi Tel Aviv and Hapoel Tel Aviv were supposed to play their match. Tel Aviv police cancelled this match. If their home country are banning teams and cancelling their matches, why should other countries host them?

08 November, 2025 16:30  
Blogger Infidel753 said...

J Roc: First, do you have any evidence for that (link to a credible news source)? Second, what on Earth does that have to do with the post topic (the US election)?

08 November, 2025 18:48  
Blogger Richard said...

Do you think that Alan Dershowitz is "going to blow his brains out on live tv" ?

09 November, 2025 01:29  
Blogger Infidel753 said...

No. If he does, he knows where he's going.

09 November, 2025 05:20  

Post a Comment

Please be on-topic and read the comments policy. Spam, trolls, and fight-pickers will be deleted. If you don't have a Blogspot account and aren't sure how to comment, please see here. Fair warning: anything supporting transgender ideology, or negative toward Brexit, or in favor of a military draft or compulsory national service, will be deleted. I am not obligated to provide a platform for views I find morally abhorrent.

No comments advocating violence against any specific identifiable individual, even jokingly.

Please be considerate -- no political or politics-tinged comments on non-political posts, and no performative cynicism (or cynicism in general).

<< Home