"But this is going to be a generational challenge in the Muslim world and
the Middle East that not only the United States but everybody's going
to have to deal with. And we're going to have to have some humility in
recognizing that we don't have the option of simply invading every
country where disorder breaks out. And that to some degree, the people
of these countries are going to have to, you know, find their own way.
And we can help them but we can't do it for them.
"But I am a firm believer that particularly in this modern internet age,
the capacity of the old-style authoritarian government to sustain itself
and to thrive just is going to continue to weaken. It's going to
continue to crumble that model. My argument to any partner that we have
is that you are better off if you've got a strong civil society and
you've got democratic legitimacy and you are respectful of human rights.
That's how you're going to attract businesses, that's how you're going
to have a strong workforce, that's how ultimately you've got a more
durable not just economy but also political system.
"And, I think, the goal of any good foreign policy is having a vision and
aspirations and ideals, but also recognizing the world as it is, where
it is, and figuring out how do you tack to the point where things are
better than they were before. That doesn't mean perfect. It just means
it's better. The trajectory of this planet overall is one toward less
violence, more tolerance, less strife, less poverty. I've said this
before and I think some folks in Washington were like, 'Oh, he's
ignoring the chaos of all the terrible stuff that's happening.' Of
course, I'm not ignoring it. I'm dealing with it every day.
"People are right to be suspicious of Iran. Iran has sponsored state
terrorism. It has consistently, at the highest levels, made deplorable
anti-Israeli statements. It is repressive to its own people, and there
is clear and unavoidable evidence that in the past they have tried to
develop a weapons program and have tried to hide it from view. So that's a given. And it's understandable why people are concerned, both here and around the world. But what I've also said is that the deal that we've struck, this interim
deal brought about by the tough sanctions regime that we put together,
offers us our best opportunity to solve the problem of a nuclear Iran
without resorting to military force. Iran is negotiating seriously for
the first time, and they have made, so far, real concessions in the
negotiations. We have been able to freeze the program for the first time
and, in fact, roll back some elements of its program, like its
stockpiles of ultra highly enriched uranium. And so, for us to give an
additional two to three months to exhaust all possibilities of a
diplomatic resolution when nobody denies — including our intelligence
agencies, and Mossad and others — nobody denies that Iran right now
really is abiding by the terms of our agreement, so we're not losing
ground. They're not surreptitiously developing a weapon while we talk.
For us to give two, three months to figure that out makes sense."
President Obama (partly found via Horizons)
Stand with Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan -- with democracy and civilization against tyranny and barbarism
Pages
▼
20 February 2015
5 comments:
Please be on-topic and read the comments policy. Spam, trolls, and fight-pickers will be deleted. If you don't have a Blogger account and aren't sure how to comment, see here. Fair warning: anything even remotely supportive of transgender ideology, or negative toward Brexit, or supportive of a military draft or compulsory national service, will be deleted and result in a permanent ban. I am not obligated to provide a platform for views I find morally abhorrent.
On work days there is likely to be a substantial delay in approving comments, since I can't do blog stuff in an office. For this I apologize.
Statesmanship is considered a weakness among the chest-pounding war mongers.
ReplyDeleteListen, people like Giuliani and Graham are only too happy and too eager to send your children to fight their manly wars. And if anyone disagrees, that's proof that they don't love America.
"And we're going to have to have some humility in recognizing that we don't have the option of simply invading every country where disorder breaks out."
ReplyDeleteVery true. The mistakes of the Bush administration must not be repeated. Nuanced, sophisticated solutions to global extremism are required.
"My argument to any partner that we have is that you are better off if you've got a strong civil society and you've got democratic legitimacy and you are respectful of human rights."
The U.S. itself needs to do serious soul-searching and work in these areas, especially human rights. (The torture report? Guantamano? Hello?) Otherwise, the hypocrisy will be too glaring. If our current administration wants to undermine extremism, it must deny it fertile ground at home first.
Shaw & Ahab: Perhaps the most frightening thing of all about the prospect of a Republican President is what it would mean for Middle East policy. Bush II was bad enough, but the next President will face a situation there far more complex and combustible than he did, and a Republican President in 2017 would be answerable to a base far crazier than he was. Thanks goodness that, for now, we've got a nuanced thinker like Obama running things.
ReplyDeleteNice to see you're still out there telling it. All the best.
ReplyDeleteHolte: Thanks!
ReplyDelete