Rapture round-up
Camping disappears, and some of his followers turn violent.
Lady Atheist largely shares my sentiments toward the deluded.
Camping, like so many of his ilk, is a gay-hater.
News Radio has a report from the big day.
The dud doomsday holds a valuable lesson.
For some believers, disappointment fails to quench loyalty.
The atheist-bashing crap never stops.
The end was averted by our new savior.
Finally, Rapture can be fun! (Thanks to Dead Logic for reminder.)
3 Comments:
They probably won't, but I wish the media would turn this into a teaching time about these kind of beliefs. It does not matter one whit that these people stood on a mountain to wait for the Rapture but it matters a LOT that they vote! That is why this should be a teaching moment but it likely won't be.
While i feel that the deluded followers bear some responsibility for their poor decisions, I still want to see Harold Camping and his corporation shoulder some of the financial burden of getting these people back on their feet. I will guarantee you that Camping didn't drain his bank account or sell his home, that he is still living a life of comfort with all his financial needs met.
If he was a decent person, he would arrange for a grant program, where his devastated followers could apply for reimbursement of their losses. *If* -- but I seriously doubt that will happen.
And yes, I realize that people stupid enough to believe Camping in spite of his previous failed predictions do deserve at least some of the hardship they brought upon themselves. But I don't blame them anymore than I blame the victims of con artists who fall for transparent schemes that appeal to the mark's greed -- the perpetrator of the con is still held legally responsible no matter how willing the victim.
Rain: Unfortunately the media tend to go with the flow. What I'm seeing now in the MSM is a Sargasso of cookie-cutter articles saying "it's time for sympathy, not derision" -- the default herd position is to criticize anyone who's mean to the poor idiots, not that I've found any examples of that on the MSM.
GL: It's hard to see what the legal case against Camping would be. He didn't do anything fraudulent, except in claiming absolute certainty about something no human could possibly know -- just as all religions do. Where Camping differed from most religious leaders was that he made a falsifiable prediction. Most of them avoid that.
I suppose he might try to help people out voluntarily. We'll see. I tend to doubt it.
Post a Comment
<< Home