Decision time in the Senate
Unlike many who are energized about this, I don't claim to know for certain what is the best course of action here. I doubt anyone knows for sure. However, I found this post clarifying. Elon Musk wants a shutdown. The Republican vandals who support his wrecking of the federal government want a shutdown. It would provide cover to do a lot more damage.
Whatever the circumstances, government shutdowns do a lot of real harm to real people. Hundreds of thousands of federal workers get furloughed without pay, and hundreds of thousands more have to work without pay. This would be damaging even in a healthy economy -- in our current economy already badly crippled by Trump's idiotic trade wars and Musk's mass firings, the ripple effects of so many additional people suddenly losing their income might well be catastrophic.
In all the online exhortations urging Senate Democrats to block the continuing resolution, I've seen little or no sign of any interest in all the people who would be hurt by a shutdown. One of those people might well be me. My Social Security alone is not enough to live on, so I need periodic temp work to survive. So far this year I've had only a couple days worth of work, probably because companies are reluctant to hire in the midst of all the economic chaos and uncertainty that Trump is creating. If I don't find something real within the next month or so, I'll quickly become unable to even pay the rent. I'm at enough risk already without the even further damage that a government shutdown would do to the overall economy. Many, perhaps millions, are in a similar position. But to those whose only concern is "oppose the Republicans!" no matter what the real-world impact, apparently I and people like me are just acceptable collateral damage.
One could engage in all kinds of logic-pretzeling about whose fault it would be, but the fact is that the Senate Democrats, right now, have the power to prevent a shutdown, and it's they who must decide whether or not to do so. We elect legislators to protect people from harm, not to allow preventable harm and hope the other party gets blamed for it.
Under the status quo, there has in fact been effective resistance to the Republicans. Court rulings have gone against several of Musk's worst actions. Trump has repeatedly backed down on bad decisions when faced with enough pushback or with sudden stock-market plunges. Some of the damage, at least, is being contained. The last thing we need now is the wrecking ball of a shutdown.


10 Comments:
So... heads, the government shuts down and the Ketamine Crackhead bulldozes the empty buildings, seize more power during a shutdown, because it would give the administration the ability to deem whole agencies, programs and personnel non-essential, furloughing staff with no promise they would ever be rehired.
Tails, the CR is passed (the Democrats) believe gives President Donald Trump vast discretion on spending decisions.
Do we want lubed or raw?
We choose the less bad of two bad options, the one that does less harm to innocent people. Not doing what Elon Musk says he wants is probably a good guideline. And I think the article I linked to is clarifying.
Thank you for the sanity check. I... concur, though my knee-jerk reaction this morning was "SCHUMER! YOU IDIOT!! WIELD YOUR POWER!".
But I am over that. There is no BEST option, just, as you said, a lesser of two evil options - and not hurting citizens is always the better of the two.
I hope a shutdown can be avoided. As you say, it would threaten thousands of jobs and put people like you in a desperate financial situation. Democrats need to show their mettle and prevent catastrophe.
A shutdown would be bad so I do hope it doesn't happen.
I think you're wrong.
I think the habits of normalization and equivocation will numb the nerves until things are far too broken to be corrected. Far better, IMHO, to have a shock large enough to wake people up before the option of getting the bastards of of office has passed.
The American people are still thinking this is normal order where a sharp tongued judge will bring Trump and company to heel any day now. That surely they will sober up and act rationally before large numbers of people have to live under bridges and eat cat food.
They haven't understood that we passed that point a month ago. A budget failure will wet people know the noose is around our necks and we are standing on the trap door. That now is the time for torches and pitchforks. Before they have consolidated power. While we still have a chance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-iA-TDR_Os
Yes, a budget failure means more pain now. But the alternative is the same end result over a longer time. Yes, you can cut a dog's tail off a little at a time but it is more humane to do it in one stroke.
A big shock might precipitate the necessary uprising. Or, it might be too late already.
50/50 on shutdown maybe but THERE'S NO EXCUSE FOR NOT FILIBUSTERING & EXTRACTING SOME COMPROMISE. When you rollover for schoolyard bullies, they come back the next day and kick your ass more. My Senators Schumer and Gillibrand are dead to me: quislings, colloborators.
Nick & Mary: Fortunately, we've escaped the worst -- at least for now. These things often come down to the last moment.
Anon & Stewart: And so to you, just like to all the ideological bloggers baying for blood about this, all the millions of ordinary people who would have been hurt by a shutdown are just acceptable collateral damage, not worthy even of a mention in your comments, even though that issue was the main point of the post you're responding to.
Nor do you even mention the point that Elon Musk said he wanted a shutdown. He knew it would give him the opportunity to cause far more damage than passing the CR would.
There's no reason to think that a filibuster blocking the CR would have led the Republicans to negotiate. They would quite happily have allowed the government to shut down. They've done it before.
Or as Clay Bennett put it... https://www.gocomics.com/claybennett/2025/03/15
Post a Comment
Please be on-topic and read the comments policy. Spam, trolls, and fight-pickers will be deleted. If you don't have a Blogspot account and aren't sure how to comment, please see here. Fair warning: anything supporting transgender ideology, or negative toward Brexit, or in favor of a military draft or compulsory national service, will be deleted. I am not obligated to provide a platform for views I find morally abhorrent.
No comments advocating violence against any specific identifiable individual, even jokingly.
Please be considerate -- no political or politics-tinged comments on non-political posts, and no performative cynicism (or cynicism in general).
<< Home